Introductions

The Ecologic Institute, Washington, DC, occupies a few offices on the third floor of a building on Connecticut Avenue in the Dupont Circle area of Washington, DC. The area is well-known for its great night-life and shopping, and is something of a hotspot for the GLBT community, but it's also well-known for its think tanks, with a number of well-known ones in the area, including the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (amongst others). We share the third floor with some other organizations: the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), the Antarctic and Southern Oceans Coalition, and a small outpost of an academic honors society.

As I said in my previous post, we have three permanent staff members: Michael Mehling, the president, Dominic Marcellino and Elena von Sperber; plus Kim (who got the office administrator job that I applied for) and assorted interns. I'll spread the introductions over two posts, to keep things manageable.

Sharing an office with me is my fellow intern, Shanyn Ronis. Originally from Seattle, Shanyn has a Masters in Anthropology, and she actually started about a month before me, meaning that her time here will sadly be drawing to a close tomorrow. She has only been coming in to the office three times a week, because she travels in from Leesburg, Virginia (a two-and-a-half hour commute). Lately, she has been working on a project on the factors influencing people's environmental behavior with an intern in Berlin (Ecologic's head office). She and Andreas (the intern, not to be confused with Andreas Kraemer, the head of Ecologic in Berlin!) have had some very involved technical discussions about the interaction between internal and external motivators that I had trouble following. It looked interesting at any rate.

Michael is an expert in international environmental policy and law. He recently got back from China, and it sounds as if he enjoyed the time there very much. He says there is so much energy and enthusiasm for developing renewable energy there - in contrast to the seemingly insurmountable inertia on climate-related issues here in the US. Near the beginning of my time here, I edited a paper on the development of legislation related to renewable energy in China. It seems that although everyone in the West is praising China's renewable energy policies, they are largely born out of necessity rather than concern about climate change, because the country is going to have to deal with the rapidly increasing demand for energy without pumping the air full of smoke and sickening people and the environment. One of the big challenges of creating awareness for climate change and the need to reduce carbon emissions here in the US is that the issue of "visible" pollution here was largely dealt with in the 1970s, so people don't equate a reduction in carbon emissions with the tangible benefit of a cleaner environment.

Elena is also German (as is Michael). Before moving here she worked at the Blue Flag Programme in Denmark, a voluntary ecolabel certification program for beaches. Here, she is kept running with a variety of really interesting projects. At the moment, she is winding up a project called 'CALAMAR' - a transatlantic dialogue between the US and the EU on integrated marine governance for the North Atlantic, as well as one on the tourism to Antarctic. The latter is particularly interesting, because she says it's a subject on which not much research has been done until now. The industry for tourism to Antarctic has also grown and changed lately, going from small expeditions for relatively wealthy, well-prepared clients, to larger, less well-prepared expeditions for young people seeking adventure. Most of the tourism has been sea-based, as there aren't really any permanent land-based structures there (apart from a few research stations), but there is talk of this changing, with some of the parties involved in Antarctic (nobody actually owns Antarctic) not averse to putting up some kind of permanent structures to accommodate tourists. Also, the new adventurous young crowd are not content to just “stand there and look at penguins” - they want something more, well, adventurous. There is a considerable amount of resistance to this new trend, because, besides posing a greater danger to tourists, it is said that it will distract researchers from their work, as they may be obliged to be involved in search and rescue teams to look for lost tourists. I can just picture it: shivering tourists in shorts and Hawaiian shirts, cameras slung around their necks, getting lost in the Antarctic wilderness ("I told you we should have turned left at the penguin!").

Another big project that kept her very busy for a few weeks, and which I was also involved in, is a project for the BMU (the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety). In June 2008, the European Union adopted the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, a framework for managing the marine environment adjacent to the European Union. It takes an integrated approach, called an “Integrated Ecological Assessment” (IEA), which defines the desired outcome not in terms of how conditions would have been if no human being had ever come near, but as “Good Environmental Status”, or GES – a state where human activities and the ecosystems supporting them are in balance. This is pretty revolutionary, because until now, ecosystem health was assessed leaving out human needs in their interaction with the ecosystem. The question is, though, how do you assess the health of these systems, which involve the interaction of many different factors?

The EU has taken an approach that involves selecting certain key indicators – particularly sensitive species, for instance – and establishing levels at which they could be considered to be in a healthy state. The environmental status is then determined by the proportion of these indicators that are at the levels they should be. The particular report that Elena was working on (with three other colleagues in Berlin) was an overview of Integrated Ecological Assessment methodologies that have been implemented around the world thus far. None is as comprehensive as the directive envisages, but quite a lot could be learned from what has been done so far. Compiling a comparative study (including interviews with experts, factsheets and analyses) of the various methodologies was a massive job, and the subject matter challenging to get to grips with, but all in all a very worthwhile and challenging project.

A new intern started at the beginning of this week: Raleigh is in the middle of a Masters in environmental policy, and comes from Los Angeles. Two more interns will start at the beginning of next week, so the office is going to get pretty crowded…